
Great news: new low pricing on my ebook, Marketing 365! Loaded with daily strategies that will kick-start your marketing program--just $4.95. Click on the link to the right to get started right now.
We're nearly finished with February -- is that possible? Before we wave goodbye to our shortest month, we still have some unfinished business when it comes to promotion and client generation.
Client generation tip: I spent this week finishing up an article project and pitching a few more ideas to other publications. Now is when magazines are flush with budgets. The work that's here now will dissipate by October. Get busy while you can.
I sent out a few letters of introduction and got back in touch with some prospects who'd responded with enthusiasm when I'd gotten in touch. We'll see.
Thanks to Susan Johnston of The Urban Muse blog (and author of LinkedIn and Lovin' It) for sending me this link to a Huffington Post wonk describing why his organization doesn't pay its writers. Sorry I can't embed it: that function has been disabled for this video. But do follow the link and share in host Allison Hope Weiner's outrage. Hers was more controlled than I could have been, but she did a fine job handling such a load of BS with finesse:
You Tube Video
Note when she asks "Don't you feel any obligation to pay those writers?" regarding those articles HuffPo lifts and reprints without pay, the HuffPo Managing Editor Jimmy Soni says "We direct substantial sums of traffic to other news organizations because we're willing to give credit where credit is due. A lot of authors have written to us and said the opposite of what you're saying, which is 'Thank you for linking to my work...'"
She hammers back at him, but he starts his answer with what's become my least favorite word in the English language: "So we have paid reporters on staff..." To me, "So..." is not an argument -- it's a brush off and it shows someone who's ignoring what's in front of them. But I digress.
What I love is when Soni describes how a high school student submitted a letter that got the attention of the First Lady, Weiner replies"I find it disturbing that now you have high school students writing for free."
But throughout this entire video, what stands out to me? The bullshit, which is not new. It's just that it's so practiced.
The responses by Soni are exactly what one would expect because it's repeated by other groups with similar business platforms. Pay as little as possible for as much as possible. And never apologize. Instead, expect gratitude.
Here are the underlying messages, plus where these platforms fail the freelance writing and journalism professions:
Writers should be honored to have us lift their stuff. They'll pick up your articles from news agencies and link back. That's it. That's the part you're expected to feel "honored" about. It's not unlike that pushy girl in high school who stole your boyfriend while sidling up to you in mock friendship. She gets the boy. You get "credit" for introducing them.
We're giving writers free exposure! Oh, super. Another person wanting to increase my popularity by expecting me to work for free. Get in line. Better yet, get lost.
Payment will come later (and by other people) once you gain notoriety. If I had a nickel for every time I was promised payment via increased notoriety, hell, I'd be rich. And I sure as hell wouldn't be working for someone who doesn't pay.
Writers should be thanking us. I will never quite understand why I should thank someone for stealing my work and giving me one lousy link back to my stolen work while they keep the ad revenue and site traffic. I've had that happen, and the dude doing the stealing had the audacity to chew me out for being "too stupid" to see the big picture. He didn't see the even-bigger picture -- the one where my attorney was standing in the wings ready to pounce on that plagiarism and copyright infringement stuff.
We're assuming all writers want to be associated with us. This is a big problem. What if you are opposed to the practices of the people thinking they're "promoting" you? What if you loathe their business model or cannot abide by their actions or attitudes? Tough noogies. They've decided to "honor" you by linking you directly to them. If they end up in a huge scandal, they've just made you guilty by association. Like that guy who stole my content -- he assumed I wanted to be associated with him. He couldn't have been more wrong.
It's why we go down the Writers Worth road every May, and why this blog and others like it exists: you are worth so much more than nothing, and no amount of linking or promising payment or giving $10 stipends and calling it a paycheck will suffice. Promoting yourself is your business in all meanings of the phrase. Don't allow someone to steal your work and smooth-talk you into submission. Defend your right to run your business your way.
How has your work been "promoted" without your permission?
How do you think that differs from blogs sharing links?









